Journal Information
Vol. 33. Issue 10.
Pages 641-643 (October 2014)
Visits
6476
Vol. 33. Issue 10.
Pages 641-643 (October 2014)
Evidenced-Based Cardiology
Open Access
Cochrane Corner: What is the clinical impact of oxygen therapy for acute myocardial infarction? Evaluation of a Cochrane systematic review
Cochrane Corner: Qual é o impacto clínico da administracão de oxigénio em doentes com enfarte agudo do miocárdio? Avaliacão de uma revisão sistemática Cochrane
Visits
6476
Daniel Caldeiraa,b, António Vaz-Carneiroc,d,
Corresponding author
avc@fm.ul.pt
avc@vcsm.pt

Corresponding author.
, João Costaa,c,d
a Laboratório de Farmacologia Clínica e Terapêutica, Faculdade Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
b Serviço de Cardiologia, Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, Portugal
c Centro de Estudos de Medicina Baseada na Evidência, Faculdade Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
d Centro Colaborador Português da Rede Cochrane Iberoamericana, Lisboa, Portugal
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (1)
Full Text
Clinical question

What is the clinical impact of oxygen therapy for acute myocardial infarction?

Description of review

This is a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on routine use of inhaled oxygen in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI] or non-STEMI) within the first 24 hours after the onset of symptoms. The primary outcome was overall mortality; the secondary outcome was opiate use as a surrogate outcome for pain.

Results

The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Web of Science were searched and the eligibility of the results was assessed. Four RCTs were included for the qualitative and quantitative analysis, involving 430 patients and 17 deaths. Studies in which hyperbaric or aqueous oxygen, oxygen associated with hemoglobin, or oxygen combined with nitric oxide were excluded.

In the selected studies, oxygen was administered at 4–6 l/min by facial mask or nasal cannula. Oxygen therapy was compared with no oxygen administration or its use only in cases of hypoxemia.

The relative risks of death and opiate use were not significantly different between groups (Figure 1), and a significant increase (16%) in risk of death was observed in the oxygen therapy arm in the two most recent RCTs. The small number of deaths does not exclude that this may be due to chance.

Figure 1.

Main results of the systematic review by Cabello et al.1 CI: confidence interval.

(0.15MB).
Conclusions

There is no conclusive evidence from RCTs to support the routine use of inhaled oxygen in people with AMI.

Comment

This systematic review1 highlights the scarcity of clinical trials assessing oxygen therapy in patients with AMI, which is a common practice in the treatment of these patients. The best available evidence suggests that there is no benefit in either mortality or pain relief (assessed using opiate use as a proxy).

Oxygen therapy is common practice in patients with AMI and according to cross-sectional studies many health professionals (>50%) consider that oxygen reduces mortality, and around 80% routinely administer oxygen in cases of AMI.2,3

This attitude is strengthened by the mechanistic belief that increased oxygen supply reduces ischemia and hence pain and mortality. However, the results of the meta-analysis suggest that routine use of this intervention tends to increase mortality, which may be explained by oxygen's vasoconstrictor properties,4 leading to increased vascular resistance and reducing coronary flow.5

Nevertheless, the results of this review should be considered in the light of the limitations of the individual studies, the low overall methodological quality, with a high risk of attrition bias due to loss of follow-up data after randomization, and of bias due to selective outcome reporting. Another limitation is related to changes in the way that acute coronary syndromes are treated; nowadays patients routinely receive therapies that have a significant impact on prognosis, including dual antiplatelet therapy, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, statins, and coronary revascularization. Sensitivity analysis excluding the older studies to assess the effect of oxygen therapy on mortality in contemporary practice supports the conclusion that routine oxygen therapy has no clinical benefit in these patients.

It should also be considered that most of the studies in the review included different pathophysiological entities with different treatments (STEMI and non-STEMI), and so the real impact of oxygen therapy in these different contexts is not known.

In contrast to the results of this review, another Cochrane review6 of six clinical trials with 665 patients with acute coronary syndrome estimated that hyperbaric oxygen therapy reduced the relative risk (RR) of death by 42% (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.36–0.92). This result prompts the question as to whether the negative findings of the review under discussion are due to its low statistical power and/or methodological weaknesses.7

The current guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology only recommend oxygen therapy in cases of hypoxemia.8,9

The clinical question posed here clearly needs to be answered definitely by future pragmatic clinical trials with an appropriate design and size.

Ethical disclosuresProtection of human and animal subjects

The authors declare that no experiments were performed on humans or animals for this study.

Confidentiality of data

The authors declare that no patient data appear in this article.

Right to privacy and informed consent

The authors declare that no patient data appear in this article.

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References
[1]
J.B. Cabello, A. Burls, J.I. Emparanza, et al.
Oxygen therapy for acute myocardial infarction.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 8 (2013), pp. CD007160
[2]
A. Burls, J.I. Emparanza, T. Quinn, et al.
Oxygen use in acute myocardial infarction: an online survey of health professionals’ practice and beliefs.
Emerg Med J, 27 (2010), pp. 283-286
[3]
C. Arslanian-Engoren, K.A. Eagle, B. Hagerty, et al.
Emergency department triage nurses’ self-reported adherence with American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association myocardial infarction guidelines.
J Cardiovasc Nurs, 26 (2011), pp. 408-413
[4]
H.S. Loeb, R. Chuquimia, M.Z. Sinno, et al.
Effects of low-flow oxygen on the hemodynamics and left ventricular function in patients with uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction.
Chest, 60 (1971), pp. 352-355
[5]
P.H. McNulty, N. King, S. Scott, et al.
Effects of supplemental oxygen administration on coronary blood flow in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 288 (2005), pp. H1057-62
[6]
M.H. Bennett, J.P. Lehm, N. Jepson.
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for acute coronary syndrome.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev, (2011), pp. CD004818
[7]
P. Meier, S. Ebrahim, C.M. Otto, et al.
Oxygen therapy in acute myocardial infarction – good or bad?.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 8 (2013), pp. ED000065
[8]
P.G. Steg, S.K. James, D. Atar, et al.
Task Force on the management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation.
Eur Heart J, 33 (2012), pp. 2569-2619
[9]
C.W. Hamm, J.P. Bassand, S. Agewall, et al.
ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).
Eur Heart J, 32 (2011), pp. 2999-3054

Please cite this article as: Caldeira D, Vaz-Carneiro A, Costa J. Cochrane Corner – qual é o impacto clínico da administração sistemática de oxigénio em doentes com enfarte agudo do miocárdio? Avaliação da revisão sistemática: Cabello JB, Burls A, Emparanza JI, Bayliss S, Quinn T. Oxygen therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 21;8:CD007160. Rev Port Cardiol. 2014;33:641–643.

Copyright © 2014. Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia
Idiomas
Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia (English edition)
Article options
Tools
en pt

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos

By checking that you are a health professional, you are stating that you are aware and accept that the Portuguese Journal of Cardiology (RPC) is the Data Controller that processes the personal information of users of its website, with its registered office at Campo Grande, n.º 28, 13.º, 1700-093 Lisbon, telephone 217 970 685 and 217 817 630, fax 217 931 095, and email revista@spc.pt. I declare for all purposes that the information provided herein is accurate and correct.