Informação da revista
Vol. 43. Núm. 7.
Páginas 385-387 (julho 2024)
Baixar PDF
Mais opções do artigo
Vol. 43. Núm. 7.
Páginas 385-387 (julho 2024)
Editorial comment
Acesso de texto completo
Exercise and sports revisited: Is too much exercise bad for your heart?
Exercício e desporto revisitados: o excesso de exercício é mau para o coração?
Pedro Rioa,b, Nuno Cardima,c,
Autor para correspondência

Corresponding author.
a Hospital CUF Descobertas, Lisboa, Portugal
b Hospital de Santa Marta – CHULC, Lisboa, Portugal
c Nova Medical School, Lisboa, Portugal
Este item recebeu
Informação do artigo
Texto Completo
Baixar PDF
Texto Completo

The study by Pereira et al. published in this issue of the journal1 raises pertinent questions about the interaction between physical activity, plaque morphology, and risk of cardiovascular disease.

The possible relationship between physical activity and the development of coronary artery disease (CAD) has been neglected for many years. However, the topic of coronary atherosclerosis in athletes is today very important for two reasons: first, because the number of high-volume training athletes is increasing; second, because CAD is the most prevalent cause of exercise-related cardiac events in individuals over 35 years.2

After the landmark study of Mohlenkamp et al.3 demonstrating that in athletes the use of traditional calculators underestimates cardiovascular risk, other authors have included the coronary calcium score (CCS) to optimize the prediction of cardiovascular risk in this population,4 as well as to predict it based on the type, intensity, and duration of exercise.5,6

Based on these studies, an important question has raised – should the CCS be used in an asymptomatic and highly trained population to better stratify their cardiovascular risk?

If, on the one hand, CCS is increased in middle-aged athletes who perform greater volume of physical load per week, on the other hand, the prognostic studies carried out with this parameter are derived from the general population, that do not present high levels of physical activity.7 This doubt remains since it is not known whether higher CCS in populations with high-training volumes is related to a greater number of cardiovascular events and mortality. The classic relation between the CCS score and coronary events seen in the general population may not be true in high exercise volume athletes in whom the atherosclerotic plaque is a consequence of increased thrombogenicity, sympathetic activation, electrolyte imbalance, hyperdynamic circulation with “kinking” and spasm, shear stress and imbalance between the antioxidant and oxidative effects of exercise.8 This protective concept was supported by older studies that described the plaques of these athletes as being more calcified and therefore more stable, not prone to rupture, which could give them a lower risk of events.5 In opposition, more recent research has shown that the level of physical exercise increased both calcified and non-calcified plaques in athletes.9,10

The work of Pereira et al. suggests that, in athletes, specific cardiovascular risk assessment strategies must be developed, because of a synergistic atherosclerotic effect between classic atherosclerotic risk factors and oxidative stress derived from high levels of exercise. This is in line with a recent multicenter prospective cohort study (Master@Heart), in which lifelong athletes had a higher atherosclerotic burden, more significant proximal CAD, more unstable plaques and in which the authors suggest a possible reverse J-shaped dose–response relationship between resistance training and coronary atherosclerosis.9

However, in athletes with low to moderate cardiovascular risk this association no longer exists, and higher volume training may even be protective of greater atherosclerotic burden. The group that presents a proportion of individuals with a CAC score>100 and a segment involvement score (SIS)>5 was the one with the least training volume, in line with previous studies that indicate that moderate to high regular physical exercise results in a lower number of total and non-calcified plaques and fewer high-risk plaques.9 Of course, this will be influenced by the fact that these athletes, who exercised less, had a higher prevalence of at least one cardiovascular risk factor, showing a higher BMI (body mass index), even in the absence of a higher SCORE2.

It is important to highlight the fact that the presence of dyslipidemia and active or previous smoking in this population is quite high, especially in people who exercise and want to be healthier.11 Remarkably, the average value of LDL (low-density lipoproteins) cholesterol (considered the main cardiovascular risk factor) was, in this population, above than the desired for individuals at low to moderate risk and comparable to recent studies in athletes.9 This raises an important point and a growing concern that other lifestyle behaviors (such as a healthy diet), should be adopted by these individuals,

When appropriate, statins (and/or other ant lipidic drugs) should be prescribed to keep LDL cholesterol at therapeutic targets for the inherent cardiovascular risk. In fact, we can expect that if these athletes do not lower their cholesterol, in less than 10 years, there will be a high percentage of individuals with a calcium score>100, with a greater atherosclerotic burden and potentially with more unstable coronary disease.9,12 Even so, vigorous exercise can have the same effects as statins on the composition of the atheroma plaque, leading to its progressive calcification, decreasing its size and minimizing cardiovascular risk.13

These results cannot be extrapolated to other subgroups, such as female athletes (as the participants were all male), knowing that there is much less evidence of coronary disease in female athletes compared to their male counterparts. However, they appear to have, at most, a number and type of atherosclerotic plaques similar to controls14 or even less atherosclerotic burden.15 Additionally, the results cannot be extrapolated to patients with known cardiovascular disease (for example post-acute myocardial infarction), diabetic or chronic kidney disease patients, which were exclusion criteria from the study.

The elite exercise paradox will have to be unraveled in the future and the dose-response relationship between physical activity and cardiovascular health still needs better understanding.

Despite the favorable data linking the benefit effect of physical activity to all-cause mortality regardless of the calcium score,16,17 we do not know yet whether this burden of coronary atherosclerosis translates into a greater risk of cardiovascular events, specifically an increase in cardiovascular mortality in veteran athletes. More prospective studies with clinical endpoints are needed to evaluate these data. It will therefore be interesting to monitor follow-up data from a unique investigation into this topic – the Master@Heart study.

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

J.C. Pereira, R. Santos, F.M. Costa, et al.
Coronary atherosclerotic burden in veteran athletes: relationship with cardiovascular risk and volume of exercise.
C. O’Riordan, E. Savage, M. Newell, G. Flaherty, I. Hartigan.
Cardiovascular disease risk factor profile of experienced male amateur marathon runners: a systematic review.
Sports Health, 15 (2023), pp. 661-672
S. Mohlenkamp, N. Lehmann, F. Breuckmann, et al.
Running: the risk of coronary events.
Eur Heart J, 29 (2008), pp. 1903-1910
T.L. Braber, A. Mosterd, N.H. Prakke, et al.
Occult coronary artery disease in middle aged sportsmen with a low cardiovascular risk score: the Measuring Athlete's Risk of Cardiovascular Events (MARC) study.
Eur J Prev Cardiol, 23 (2016), pp. 1677-1684
V.L. Aengevaeren, A. Mosterd, T.L. Braber, et al.
Relationship between lifelong exercise volume and coronary atherosclerosis in athletes.
Circulation, 136 (2017), pp. 138-148
A. Merghani, V. Maestrini, S. Rosmini, et al.
Prevalence of subclinical coronary artery disease in masters endurance athletes with a low atherosclerotic risk profile.
Circulation, 136 (2017), pp. 126-137
H. McClelland, R.L. Jorgensen, N.W. Budoff, et al.
10-Year coronary heart disease risk prediction using coronary artery calcium and traditional risk factors: derivation in the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) with validation in the HNR (Heinz Nixdorf Recall) study and the DHS (Dallas Heart Study).
J Am Coll Cardiol, 66 (2015), pp. 1643-1653
H. Dores, P. de Araújo Gonçalves, N. Cardim, et al.
Coronary artery disease in athletes: an adverse effect of intense exercise?.
Rev Port Cardiol, 37 (2018), pp. 77-85
R. De Bosscher, C. Dausin, P. Claus, et al.
Lifelong endurance exercise and its relation with coronary atherosclerosis.
Eur Heart J, 44 (2023), pp. 2388-2399
G. Feuchtner, C. Langer, F. Barbieri, et al.
Relationship of exercise to coronary artery disease extent, severity and plaque type: a coronary computed tomography angiography study.
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr, 13 (2019), pp. 34-40
Bourbon M, Alves AC, Rato Q. Prevalência de fatores de risco cardiovascular na população portuguesa. E_COR. Instituto Nacional de Saúde Doutor Ricardo Jorge, IP 2019.
J.W. Gao, Q.Y. Hao, L.Y. Lu, et al.
Associations of long-term physical activity trajectories with coronary artery calcium progression and cardiovascular disease events: results from the CARDIA study.
Br J Sports Med, 56 (2022), pp. 854-861
V.L. Aengevaeren, A. Mosterd, E.A. Bakker, et al.
Exercise volume versus intensity and the progression of coronary atherosclerosis in middle-aged and older athletes: findings from the MARC-2 study.
Circulation, 147 (2023), pp. 993-1003
W. Whang, J.E. Manson, F.B. Hu, et al.
Physical exertion, exercise, and sudden cardiac death in women.
JAMA, 295 (2006), pp. 1399-1403
W.O. Roberts, R.S. Schwartz, S.M. Kraus, et al.
Long-term marathon running is associated with low coronary plaque formation in women.
Med Sci Sports Exerc, 49 (2017), pp. 641-645
Y. Arnson, A. Rozanski, H. Gransar, et al.
Impact of exercise on the relationship between CAC scores and all-cause mortality.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 10 (2017), pp. 1461-1468
C.A. German, J. Fanning, M.J. Singleton, et al.
The association between physical activity and both incident coronary artery calcification and ankle brachial index progression: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis.
Med Sci Sports Exerc, 54 (2022), pp. 800-806
Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia
Opções de artigo
en pt

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos

Ao assinalar que é «Profissional de Saúde», declara conhecer e aceitar que a responsável pelo tratamento dos dados pessoais dos utilizadores da página de internet da Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia (RPC), é esta entidade, com sede no Campo Grande, n.º 28, 13.º, 1700-093 Lisboa, com os telefones 217 970 685 e 217 817 630, fax 217 931 095 e com o endereço de correio eletrónico Declaro para todos os fins, que assumo inteira responsabilidade pela veracidade e exatidão da afirmação aqui fornecida.