Informação da revista
Vol. 42. Núm. 1.
Páginas 81-82 (Janeiro 2023)
Partilhar
Partilhar
Baixar PDF
Mais opções do artigo
Vol. 42. Núm. 1.
Páginas 81-82 (Janeiro 2023)
Letter to the Editor
Open Access
Does my transcatheter aortic valve replacement patient have cardiac amyloidosis?
Será que o meu doente com substituição valvular aórtica percutânea tem amiloidose cardíaca?
Visitas
1182
J. Almeidaa,b,
Autor para correspondência
josepauloalmeida92@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
, M.J. Ferreiraa,b, J. Rosaa,b, V. Marinhoa, M.J. Cunhaa, M. Costaa, L. Gonçalvesa,b
a Serviço de Cardiologia dos Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
b Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
Este item recebeu

Under a Creative Commons license
Informação do artigo
Texto Completo
Bibliografia
Baixar PDF
Estatísticas
Figuras (1)
Texto Completo

Aortic stenosis (AS) is highly age-related, and its prevalence is increasing rapidly in high-income countries.1 Treatment consists of either surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), although the latter is rapidly expanding.2 There are two major types of amyloid protein responsible for cardiac amyloidosis (CA) - transthyretin (TTR) and immunoglobulin lightchain (AL). Previous cohorts report an incidence ranging from nine to 16% for the presence of CA in patients with AS referred for TAVR. These patients appear to have a similar prognosis to those with AS when undergoing TAVR, but a trend toward worse prognosis if left untreated.3 We aimed to investigate the prevalence of CA in patients with severe AS referred for TAVR in the Portuguese population.

We prospectively recruited 60 consecutive patients referred for TAVR at our tertiary center (Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra) between November 2020 and May 2021. 59 patients agreed to participate and signed an informed consent, approved by the local Ethics Commission. All patients performed coronary angiogram, echocardiogram, thoracic abdominal pelvic CT scan, ECG, bone scintigraphy (99mTc-3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propanodicarboxylic acid [DPD]) and blood and urine monoclonal immunoglobulin testing (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Patient with aortic stenosis and ATTR cardiac amyloidosis before (A, B) and after TAVR (C). (A) Echocardiogram (apical 4-chamber view) shows the characteristic thickening and granular/sparkling appearance of the interventricular septum. (B) DPD scintigraphy illustrating cardiac tracer retention suggestive of cardiac amyloidosis. (C) Fluoroscopy demonstrating the 29-mm NAVITOR™ Transcatheter Valve (Abbott Laboratories, Lake Bluff, Illinois, USA).

(0,11MB).

About half (54.2%) of patients were male, average age was 82 years and the prevalence of ischemic heart disease and cardiovascular risk factors was high (Table 1). Approximately one third of patients had atrial fibrillation and 27.1% were pacemaker carriers. Echocardiographic baseline findings were: maximum aortic valve gradient 72.77±18.18 mmHg; mean aortic valve gradient 43.49±11.60; aortic valve area 0.65±0.15 cm2; interventricular septum thickness 1.30±0.23 cm; left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 52.06±11.35%; E/E′ 14.63±7.5; tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion 19.2±4 mm; right ventricle/right atrial gradient 38.1±14.32 mmHg.

Table 1.

Patient characteristics of study population.

Characteristic  AS (n=59)  Lone AS (n=53)  AS+CA (n=6)  p value 
Age (years)  81.83±6.16  81.30±6.19  86.5±3.61  0.049 
Male (%)  32 (54.2%)  26 (49.1%)  6 (100%)  0.020 
Diabetes (%)  24 (40.7%)  22 (41.5%)  2 (33.3%)  0.530 
Dyslipidemia (%)  41 (69.5%)  37 (69.8%)  4 (66.7%)  0.601 
Hypertension (%)  42 (71.2%)  38 (71.7%)  4 (66.7%)  0.563 
Atrial fibrillation (%)  21 (35.6%)  19 (35.8%)  2 (33.7%)  0.639 
Ischemic heart disease (%)  25 (42.4%)  22 (41.5%)  3 (50%)  0.507 
Pacemaker carrier (%)  16 (27.1%)  12 (22.6%)  4 (66.7%)  0.041 
Laboratory values
Creatinine (mg/dL)  1.12±0.61  1.13±0.97  0.98±0.24  0.577 
Hemoglobin (g/dL)  11.75±1.98  11.74±2.03  11.83±1.64  0.911 
Platelets (×109/L)  189.69±57.71  192.96±58.71  160.83±40.93  0.199 
Leukocytes (×109/L)  6.63±1.97  6.72±2.03  5.77±1.01  0.263 
Sodium (mmol/L)  139.44±2.80  139.47±2.77  139.17±3.37  0.803 
Potassium (mmol/L)  4.35±0.50  4.97±11.45  39.80±13.50  0.598 
Echocardiographic parameters
Mean AV gradient (mmHg)  43.49±11.60  43.97±11.45  39.80±13.49  0.456 
AV area (cm20.65±0.15  0.653±0.15  0.625±0.15  0.727 
IV Septum thickness (cm)  1.30±0.23  1.28±0.22  1.48±0.18  0.065 
LEVF (%)  52.06±11.35  53.36±11.92  49.60±4.04  0.613 

AS: aortic stenosis; CA: cardiac amyloidosis; AV: aortic valve; IV: interventricular; LEVF: left ejection ventricular fraction.

Cardiac amyloidosis was diagnosed in 6 (10.2%) patients. Perugini grade was 1 (n=3) and 3 (n=3). One patient (Perugini grade=3) was found to have plasma cell dyscrasia, producing monoclonal IgG Kappa protein. CA patients were all male, older (86.5 vs. 81.30 years, p=0.049), more frequently pacemaker carriers (66.7 vs. 22.6%, p=0.041) and had a tendency to have a thicker interventricular septum (1.48 vs. 1.28 cm, p=0.065). TAVR implantation occurred without complications.

We demonstrated that in the Portuguese population, the prevalence of CA in severe AS patients referred for TAVI is in line with that is observed in other countries. This has important consequences for the diagnosis and management of these patients. Although scores and algorithms have been developed for the diagnosis of CA,4 some may not apply in patients with concomitant AS. Recently, the apical sparing phenotype and the LVEF to global longitudinal strain ratio (EFSR), which are considered sensitive and specific parameters for the echocardiographic diagnosis of CA, were shown to be present in a high proportion of patients with severe symptomatic AS without CA.5 Earlier this month, in the biggest prospective study to date including AS and CA patients, a new scoring system for the discrimination between lone AS and AS-CA coexistence was proposed.3

Regarding treatment, in patients with AS and amyloidosis, TAVR is associated with improved outcomes and it should not be viewed as therapeutic futility, as was suggested in the past.3 The diagnosis of CA may also have management implications such as avoidance of beta-blockers, calcium channel antagonists and digoxin; cautious use of angiotensin converting enzyme-inhibitors and diuretics; lower threshold for starting anticoagulation and permanent pacing; and consideration of tafamidis in ATTR CA patients.6

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References
[1]
S. Coffey, R. Roberts-Thomson, A. Brown, et al.
Global epidemiology of valvular heart disease.
Nat Rev Cardiol, 18 (2021), pp. 853-864
[2]
A.P. Durko, R.L. Osnabrugge, N.M. Van Mieghem, et al.
Annual number of candidates for transcatheter aortic valve implantation per country: current estimates and future projections.
Eur Heart J, 39 (2018), pp. 2635-2642
[3]
C. Nitsche, P.R. Scully, K.P. Patel, et al.
Prevalence and outcomes of concomitant aortic stenosis and cardiac amyloidosis.
J Am Coll Cardiol, 77 (2021), pp. 128-139
[4]
M. Boldrini, F. Cappelli, L. Chacko, et al.
Multiparametric echocardiography scores for the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 13 (2020), pp. 909-920
[5]
M. Bastos Fernández, D. López Otero, J. López Pais, et al.
Left ventricle myocardial deformation pattern in severe aortic valve stenosis without cardiac amyloidosis. The AMY-TAVI trial.
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed), 73 (2020), pp. 961-964
Copyright © 2022. Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia
Idiomas
Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia
Opções de artigo
Ferramentas
en pt

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos

Ao assinalar que é «Profissional de Saúde», declara conhecer e aceitar que a responsável pelo tratamento dos dados pessoais dos utilizadores da página de internet da Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia (RPC), é esta entidade, com sede no Campo Grande, n.º 28, 13.º, 1700-093 Lisboa, com os telefones 217 970 685 e 217 817 630, fax 217 931 095 e com o endereço de correio eletrónico revista@spc.pt. Declaro para todos os fins, que assumo inteira responsabilidade pela veracidade e exatidão da afirmação aqui fornecida.