Sugestões
Idioma
Informação da revista
Vol. 45. Núm. 6.
Páginas 269-334 (Junho 2026)
Citação
Citação
Partilhar
Baixar PDF
Mais opções do artigo
Visitas
582
Vol. 45. Núm. 6.
Páginas 269-334 (Junho 2026)
Editorial comment
Acesso de texto completo

First phase implementation of the REACT program in Portugal: Resuscitation and emergencies in the interventional cardiology unit

Primeira fase de implementação do Programa REACT em Portugal: ressuscitação e emergências na Unidade de Cardiologia de Intervenção
Visitas
582
João Mirinha Luza,
Autor para correspondência
jmirinhaluz@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
, Ana Rita Pereiraa,b, Nuno Baltazarb, Nuno Oliveirab, Hélder Pereiraa,b,c
a Cardiology Department, Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada-Seixal Local Health Unit, Portugal
b Interventional Cardiology Unit, Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada-Seixal Local Health Unit (ULSAS), Portugal
c Lisbon Academic Medical Center (CAML), University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
Este item recebeu
Informação do artigo
Texto Completo
Bibliografia
Baixar PDF
Estatísticas
Figuras (1)
fig0005
Texto Completo

Interventional cardiology units are highly specialized environments in which the technical and clinical complexity of the procedures performed – often in urgent or emergency settings and in high-risk patients – places increased demands on multidisciplinary teams, and particularly on their readiness to manage critical situations.

Although cardiac arrest in this setting is relatively uncommon, with an estimated incidence of approximately 3.5%,1,2 its clinical impact is significant, as it is associated with mortality ranging from 15% to 34%.3,4 It is therefore essential that teams are properly prepared to respond rapidly, quickly, and effectively to these events. The wide range of clinical scenarios and procedures – including coronary and valvular interventions, electrophysiology and pacing – hinders the direct application of general advanced life support (ALS) protocols, which are often poorly suited to the specific characteristics of this setting.5 Acknowledging this gap, the European Resuscitation Council published specific recommendations in 2021 for ALS in interventional cardiology units.6 These guidelines emphasize the importance of differentiated defibrillation strategies, early use of mechanical chest compression devices, implementation of structured checklists and systematic team training. These recommendations were further reinforced in the October 2025 update.7 In 2022, the British Cardiovascular Society, in collaboration with the scientific societies of cardiology and anesthesiology, published the first guidelines specifically dedicated to the management of cardiac arrest in interventional cardiology units (Figure 1), highlighting the need for protocols tailored to this specific setting.8

Figure 1.

Central algorithm for ALS in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.

Adapted from Ref. 8, with authorization.

The REACT program – Resuscitation and Acute Catheter Lab Emergencies – was introduced in 2022 as part of this framework. Developed in Australia and New Zealand, it aims to standardize emergency and ALS algorithms for interventional cardiology units.9 Through hands-on training, clearly defined roles, and structured communication, REACT enables teams to manage a wide range of emergencies in a coordinated and effective manner. The program integrates core principles of conventional ALS with specialized, field-specific interventions such as external mechanical chest compression devices. Its focus on training and simulation has clearly improved outcomes for both patients10,11 and team preparedness12–14 across a variety of clinical scenarios.

In June 2025, the Almada-Seixal Local Health Unit became the first institution in Portugal, within the field of interventional cardiology, to implement the REACT protocols and train its professionals accordingly. This achievement established it as the first national hub to receive international certification and scientific endorsement from the Portuguese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention. This initiative aims to provide training to all professional groups and medical specialties involved in managing emergencies and ALS in interventional cardiology units. Its goal is to achieve nationwide implementation while keeping the patient at the center of care delivery.

Authors’ contributions

JML: Manuscript drafting. ARP, NB, NO, HP: Critical revision of the manuscript. All authors approved the final version to be published.

Declaration of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process

The authors declare that no artificial intelligence tools were used in the preparation of this manuscript.

Funding

This article received no external funding.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Board of Directors and the Knowledge, Research and Innovation Center (CCII) of Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada-Seixal Local Health Unit, for their availability, support and encouragement throughout this project. The authors also acknowledge the scientific support of APIC for this project.

References
[1]
A. Tripathi, P.S. Chan, M.S. Albagdadi, et al.
Variation in survival after cardiopulmonary arrest in cardiac catheterization laboratories in the United States.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 15 (2022), pp. 2463-2471
[2]
A. Elkaryoni, A.T. Tran, M. Saad, et al.
Patient characteristics and survival outcomes of cardiac arrest in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: insights from the Get With the Guidelines®-Resuscitation registry.
Resuscitation, 180 (2022), pp. 121-127
[3]
A. Tripathi, P.S. Chan, M.S. Albagdadi, et al.
Resuscitation outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: an observational cohort study.
Resuscitation, 129 (2018), pp. 112-119
[4]
J.T. Gräsner, J. Herlitz, I.B.M. Tjelmeland, et al.
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: epidemiology of cardiac arrest in Europe.
Resuscitation, 161 (2021), pp. 61-79
[5]
K. Yadav, H.T. Truong.
Cardiac arrest in the catheterization laboratory.
Curr Cardiol Rev, 14 (2018), pp. 115-120
[6]
G.D. Perkins, J.T. Graesner, F. Semeraro, et al.
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: executive summary.
[7]
C. Lott, V. Karageorgos, C. Abelairas-Gomez, et al.
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2025: special circumstances in resuscitation.
Resuscitation, 215 (2025),
[8]
J. Dunning, A. Archbold, J.P. de Bono, et al.
Joint British Societies’ guideline on management of cardiac arrest in the cardiac catheter laboratory.
Heart, 108 (2022),
[9]
J. Dunning, M. Menon, B. Chan, et al.
Practicing for emergencies in the CATH Lab: the REACT protocol.
CTSNet|the Cardiothoracic Surgery Network, (2019), http://dx.doi.org/10.25373/ctsnet.8295473
[10]
J.M. Venturini, E. Retzer, J.R. Estrada, et al.
Mechanical chest compressions improve rate of return of spontaneous circulation and allow for initiation of percutaneous circulatory support during cardiac arrest in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.
Resuscitation, 115 (2017), pp. 56-60
[11]
S. Steinemann, B. Berg, A. Skinner, et al.
In situ, multidisciplinary simulation-based teamwork training improves early trauma care.
J Surg Educ, 68 (2011), pp. 472-477
[12]
O. Al-Mukhtar, I. Bilgrami, S. Noaman, et al.
Cardiac arrest in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory.
Am J Med Qual, 36 (2020), pp. 238-246
[13]
P. Kapoor, S. Aggarwal, E. Choudhury, et al.
Simulation in cardiac catheterization laboratory: need of the hour to improve the clinical skills.
Ann Cardiac Anaesth, 19 (2016), pp. 521
[14]
S. Armenia, L. Thangamathesvaran, A. Caine, et al.
The role of high-fidelity team-based simulation in acute care settings: a systematic review.
Surg J, 4 (2018), pp. e136-e151
Copyright © 2026. Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia
Baixar PDF
Idiomas
Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia
Opções de artigo
Ferramentas