Clinical PaperEfficacy of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock
Introduction
Over the past 15 years, the 30-day mortality and overall complications of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have been substantially reduced by the use of coronary reperfusion therapy.1, 2, 3 However, cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a leading cause of death in patients hospitalized with AMI.4 Although intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) counterpulsation remains the first choice of mechanical circulatory support and plays a certain beneficial role in the management of CS,5, 6 mortality associated with AMI-related CS is expected to rise in patients who experience cardio-pulmonary arrest and receive cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR).
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) provides cardiopulmonary support and has been shown to be effective for the treatment of refractory pulmonary insufficiency,7 and for providing cardiac assistance in patients with severe cardiac failure.8, 9, 10 It has recently been reported that ECMO improves the outcome of cardiac resuscitation in patients with CS or arrest due to ischemic heart disease.11, 12 Little information, however, is available on the efficacy of ECMO for the management of AMI associated with CS.
In this study, we focused on a group of patients initially presented with AMI complicated by CS unresponsive to conventional treatment, and required ECMO support over a 5-year period. The aims of this study were to analyze the results of AMI complicated with CS necessitating ECMO, and to investigate for the associated risk factors for poor clinical outcomes.
Section snippets
Methods
The present study was approved by the Institution's Ethics Committee/Institutional Review Board. Informed consent was waived by the Ethics Committee/Institutional Review Board owing to the retrospective nature of our study.
Early post-ECMO data
Between April 2006 and July 2010, we initiated ECMO for various reasons in 40 patients, of whom 27 patients (27/40, 67.5%) required ECMO for AMI with CS. Twenty-one patients (77.8%) received at least one episode of CPR before undergoing ECMO. IABP was inserted in 2 patients (7.4%) before ECMO commencement (Table 1). The mean duration of ECMO support was 30.2 ± 30.1 (range: 1–141) h.
Revascularization was attempted for all 27 patients. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was attempted in 20
Discussion
The main findings of the present study are as follows: (a) ECMO support could improve survival in AMI patients complicated by CS (in-hospital survival rate, 16/27, 59.3%), (b) the period between CPR initiation and ECMO commencement is a significant risk factor for ECMO weaning failure, and (c) high pre-ECMO lactate level is a risk factor for poor survival. In view of these findings, we conclude that ECMO support is an effective management option in patients with AMI associated with refractory
Study limitation
Several limitations of the present study require consideration. First, this was not a prospective, randomized, controlled study, and involved a relatively small number of patients, which may explain why some characteristics identified by others, especially as predictors of mortality or ECMO weaning failure, were not found to be significant. Second, there was no definitive indication regarding the selection of ECMO or IABP as first choice for these patients, but all of our patients were
Conclusion
In conclusion, ECMO support shows good survival results for AMI patients associated with CS (in-hospital survival rate, 16/27, 59.3%). The period between CPR initiation and ECMO commencement is a significant risk factor for ECMO weaning failure. In other words, early ECMO apply (within 60 min after cardiac arrest) yields better results (successful ECMO weaning). In addition, high pre-ECMO serum lactate level was identified as a significant risk factor for poor survival.
Conflict of interest statement
There is no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgment
None.
References (23)
Effectiveness of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction
Lancet
(1986)Indications for fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction: collaborative overview of early mortality and major morbidity results from all randomised trials of more than 1000 patients
Lancet
(1994)- et al.
A composite view of cardiac rupture in the United States National Registry of Myocardial Infarction
J Am Coll Cardiol
(1996) - et al.
Contemporary utilization and outcomes of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction: the benchmark registry
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2003) - et al.
Extracorporeal life support for patients undergoing prolonged external cardiac massage
Resuscitation
(1993) - et al.
Cardiac resuscitation with percutaneous cardiopulmonary support
Lancet
(1992) - et al.
Emergency percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass support in cardiogenic shock from acute myocardial infarction
Am J Cardiol
(1989) - et al.
Pressure criterion for placement of distal perfusion catheter to prevent limb ischemia during adult extracorporeal life support
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
(2004) - et al.
Percutaneous coronary intervention for cardiogenic shock in the SHOCK Trial Registry
Am Heart J
(2001) - et al.
Analysis and results of prolonged resuscitation in cardiac arrest patients rescued by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2003)