Radionuclide Myocardial Perfusion Imaging for the Evaluation of Patients With Known or Suspected Coronary Artery Disease in the Era of Multimodality Cardiovascular Imaging
Section snippets
Multimodality appropriate use
At its peak nearly a decade ago, an estimated 40 million noninvasive cardiac examinations were being performed annually in the United States, with cardiac imaging accounting for a considerable proportion of the Medicare budget.3., 4. Recognizing the relative explosion of new cardiac imaging technologies and its impact on the practicing clinician, the American College of Cardiology along with other professional societies recently published the first Multimodality Appropriate Use Criteria, in
Strengths and limitations of radionuclide MPI
Radionuclide MPI effectively began in the early 1970s with the first reports of noninvasive evaluation of MBF at rest, and subsequently, with the addition of 201Tl MPI to electrocardiogram (ECG) exercise treadmill (ETT) testing.6 Since then, significant technological advances in hardware, software, and radiopharmaceuticals have transformed the field of nuclear cardiology (Fig 1). Currently, imaging techniques such as SPECT and PET allow for the assessment of flow-limiting CAD by evaluation of
Tailoring the imaging test to the clinical question
From the discussion above, it is clear that no single imaging modality can provide all the answers in every patient. While some have advocated for the search of the imaging modality that can be used as the “one-stop shop”, we prefer to think of the ideal modern CV imager as an expert with a bigger toolbox that provides complementary rather than competitive information. In some cases, as in patients on the very extreme spectrum of clinical risk, no imaging may be needed. As with anything in
Conclusion
We are fully in an era of multimodality imaging in the CV realm. At their core, the multiple imaging techniques at our disposal share in common the need to be utilized judiciously in the context of patient-centered clinical care coupled with interdisciplinary clinical judgment, and to be constantly evaluated for their contributions to clinical outcomes.
Disclosures
None.
References (45)
- et al.
Why all the focus on cardiac imaging?
J Am Coll Cardiol Img
(2010) - et al.
ACCF/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2013 multimodality appropriate use criteria for the detection and risk assessment of stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation appropriate use criteria task force, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2014) - et al.
Comparison of modalities to diagnose coronary artery disease
Semin Nucl Med
(1994) - et al.
Effects of adjustment for referral bias on the sensitivity and specificity of single photon emission computed tomography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease
Am J Med
(2002) - et al.
Does rubidium-82 PET have superior accuracy to SPECT perfusion imaging for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2012) - et al.
Cardiac PET perfusion: prognosis, risk stratification, and clinical management
Semin Nucl Med
(2014) - et al.
Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter accuracy (assessment by coronary computed tomographic angiography of individuals undergoing invasive coronary angiography) trial
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2008) - et al.
Relationship between CT coronary angiography and stress perfusion imaging in patients with suspected ischemic heart disease assessed by integrated PET-CT imaging
J Nucl Cardiol
(2007) - et al.
Relationship between noninvasive coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2006) - et al.
Independent and incremental prognostic value of exercise single-photon emission computed tomographic (SPECT) thallium imaging in coronary artery disease
J Am Coll Cardiol
(1993)
Prognostic value of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT
J Nucl Cardiol
Does coronary flow trump coronary anatomy?
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging
Impaired myocardial flow reserve on rubidium-82 positron emission tomography imaging predicts adverse outcomes in patients assessed for myocardial ischemia
J Am Coll Cardiol
Long-term prognostic value of 13n-ammonia myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography added value of coronary flow reserve
J Am Coll Cardiol
Patient management after noninvasive cardiac imaging results from SPARC (study of myocardial perfusion and coronary anatomy imaging roles in coronary artery disease)
J Am Coll Cardiol
Stress-only SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: a review
J Nucl Cardiol
Phase ii safety and clinical comparison with single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of coronary artery disease: flurpiridaz F 18 positron emission tomography
J Am Coll Cardiol
BMS-747158-02: a novel PET myocardial perfusion imaging agent
J Nucl Cardiol
Temporal trends in the frequency of inducible myocardial ischemia during cardiac stress testing: 1991 to 2009
J Am Coll Cardiol
Declining frequency of ischemia detection using stress myocardial perfusion imaging
J Am Coll Cardiol
Contributions of nuclear cardiology to diagnosis and prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease
Circulation
A new initiative on precision medicine
N Engl J Med
Cited by (27)
Cardiovascular Imaging for Ischemic Heart Disease in Women: Time for a Paradigm Shift
2022, JACC: Cardiovascular ImagingCitation Excerpt :A multicenter registry of 7,601 patients showed that in patients with known or suspected CAD, the extent and severity of ischemia and scar on PET MPI provided robust and incremental risk estimates of cardiac death and all-cause death compared with traditional coronary risk factors, with a predicted annual cardiac event rate of <1% for a normal scan vs >4.2% for an abnormal scan.38 Hybrid or sequential PET/CT imaging protocols add the capability to evaluate anatomical disease with quantification of CAC scoring or with coronary CTA, thereby increasing test sensitivity for the diagnosis of CAD, including nonobstructive disease.39 In women, stress myocardial perfusion PET has several advantages over the more commonly performed SPECT imaging, including higher spatial resolution, improved diagnostic accuracy, lower radiation exposure, and the ability to quantify myocardial blood flow and CFR to diagnose INOCA.
A Validated Model to Identify Patients With Low Likelihood of High-Risk Coronary Artery Disease Anatomy
2022, American Journal of CardiologyCitation Excerpt :Standardized definitions from the 2001 and 2013 American Heart Association exercise standards for testing and training were used to define EST variables and to determine normal and abnormal responses to exercise.10,11 Myocardial perfusion imaging was considered positive if there was any perfusion defect, abnormal viability, transient ischemic dilation, or evidence of global or regional left ventricular systolic dysfunction at rest or after stress.12 Results were categorized as positive, negative, or missing.
Noninvasive cardiovascular imaging techniques
2022, Cardiovascular Toxicity and Therapeutic Modalities Targeting Cardio-oncology: From Basic Research to Advanced StudyPositron emission tomography in ischemic heart disease
2019, Revista Portuguesa de CardiologiaCitation Excerpt :The combination of these findings in prognostic assessment supports the conclusion that overall atherosclerotic disease burden and resultant macro- and microvascular ischemia, with or without obstructive epicardial lesions, are important contributors to overall CV risk. As such, PET-derived MFR may have particular prognostic importance as a sensitive global biomarker for functional IHD, especially in its ability to integrate complex pathophysiological sequelae at the target organ of interest.49 Although the role of MFR in establishing prognosis is becoming clearer, more data are needed to generate sufficient evidence of its value.
Nuclear Imaging and PET
2018, Chronic Coronary Artery Disease: A Companion to Braunwald's Heart DiseaseOut With the Old Rule-Out: Raising the Bar for Acute Chest Pain Evaluation With Randomized Trials of Cardiac Imaging
2017, JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
Statement of Conflict of Interest: see page XX.