Review Article
Quantification of epicardial fat by computed tomography: Why, when and how?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2013.01.002Get rights and content

Abstract

In the past decade, interest has grown in the relation between epicardial fat and cardiovascular disease. Several imaging modalities such as echocardiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging can be used to quantify epicardial adipose tissue. Computed tomography provides high spatial resolution and true volume coverage of the heart; therefore, it constitutes an attractive approach to quantifying epicardial fat. An increasing body of evidence has been accumulated which shows a relation between epicardial fat volume and coronary atherosclerosis, cardiovascular outcomes, and even non–atherosclerotic heart disease such as atrial fibrillation. The association of increased epicardial fat volume with cardiac disease remains significant even after correction for weight, body mass index, and traditional cardiovascular risk factors. The mechanisms have not been reliably identified, but metabolic properties of epicardial fat may play a role. At the present time, epicardial fat quantification is not included in recommended algorithms for risk stratification. However, the available data are intriguing enough to warrant further research.

Introduction

Within the pericardial sac, adipose tissue surrounds the myocardium. Epicardial fat creates a smooth surface and, along with the pericardial fluid, facilitates motion of the heart relative to the pericardium. Interestingly, the amount and distribution of epicardial fat varies widely between persons and are not strictly related to body mass index (BMI) or obesity. The coronary arteries are embedded in epicardial fat over most of their course. In fact, a growing body of evidence indicates that there is a significant relation between epicardial fat and coronary artery disease (CAD).1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Even for non–atherosclerotic diseases, such as atrial fibrillation, a correlation to epicardial fat has been proposed.7 This review provides an overview of the current literature about epicardial fat, its quantification, and its relation to cardiac disease.

Section snippets

Definition of epicardial fat

The terminology used to define fat deposits surrounding the heart in the current literature is diverse and, to some extent, confusing. It includes terms such as “epicardial,” “pericardial,” “paracardiac,” and “intrathoracic” fat.2, 3, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 The term pericardial fat is frequently used in most of the published literature and refers to adipose tissue enclosed within the pericardial sac. It is hence the fat contained in the pericardial space, between the serous epicardium and the

Epicardial fat: A metabolically active fat depot?

The importance of differentiating adipose tissue within and outside the pericardium lies in the fact that they are anatomically, embryologically, and biochemically different.11, 12 Furthermore, convincing data indicate that epicardial fat is metabolically active and functions as a source of several adipokines, which leads some researchers to assume that, through paracrine or vasocrine mechanisms, there may be a direct interaction between epicardial fat on the one hand and the closely related

Epicardial fat and relation to coronary atherosclerosis

Because of the close proximity of epicardial fat to the coronary arteries, the hypothesis of a direct mediator-related role in the development and progression of coronary atherosclerosis has been generated, and it has received increasing support over the past decade through 2 lines of evidence. First, the amount of epicardial fat seems to be relatively independent from overall adipose body tissue but, like intra-abdominal visceral fat, shows an association to atherosclerosis. Second,

Epicardial fat and cardiovascular outcome

Analysis of cardiovascular events in follow-up studies represents the true “gold standard” for risk stratification measures. In a case–cohort study by Ding et al,38 intrathoracic fat volume (15 mm above and 30 mm below the superior extent of the left main coronary artery) quantified in a baseline CT of 972 persons with no incident CAD (myocardial infarction, resuscitated cardiac arrest, angina, or fatal coronary heart disease) randomly selected from 6814 Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis

Epicardial fat and non–atherosclerotic heart disease

A number of studies have shown associations of epicardial fat with non–coronary heart disease, including striking associations to atrial fibrillation. Recently Al Chekakie et al7 demonstrated that epicardial fat as quantified by CT was highly associated with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation independent of traditional risk factors, including left atrial enlargement. Patients with atrial fibrillation had significantly larger epicardial fat volumes than patients in sinus rhythm, and

Quantification of epicardial fat

Several imaging modalities, including echocardiography, magnetic resonance, and CT, have been used over the past decade for in vivo quantification of epicardial fat. Surrogate parameters to estimate the true volume of epicardial fat include epicardial fat thickness, pericoronary fat thickness, and epicardial fat areas in single cross sections. However, given the considerable interindividual differences in the distribution of epicardial fat, it is questionable whether such surrogate parameters

Epicardial fat: What is normal and what is abnormal?

The absence of standardized reference values for epicardial fat volumes is a main limitation for a widespread use in clinical routine. Little data are available to determine cut-off  values for what should be considered abnormally high epicardial fat or cardiac adipostiy. In a community-based sample of >3000 middle-aged persons, Thanassouslis et al8 quantified epicardial and paracardiac fat volumes in participants from the Framingham Heart study. For the overall sample, the median values for

Clinical implications: When to quantify epicardial fat?

With the current body of evidence, epicardial fat assessment cannot yet be recommended to use in clinical routine. No uniform algorithms are available for data acquisition, interpretation, and epicardial fat quantification, and data are insufficient about the normal distribution of fat volumes in the population. Available data about the prognostic benefit are not sufficiently strong to justify performing a cardiac CT examination for the sole purpose of quantifying epicardial fat, and it is

References (45)

  • Y. Hirata et al.

    Coronary atherosclerosis is associated with macrophage polarization in epicardial adipose tissue

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2011)
  • M. Konishi et al.

    Association of pericardial fat accumulation rather than abdominal obesity with coronary atherosclerotic plaque formation in patients with suspected coronary artery disease

    Atherosclerosis

    (2010)
  • T.D. Wang et al.

    Association of epicardial adipose tissue with coronary atherosclerosis is region-specific and independent of conventional risk factors and intra-abdominal adiposity

    Atherosclerosis

    (2010)
  • R. Nakanishi et al.

    Increase in epicardial fat volume is associated with greater coronary artery calcification progression in subjects at intermediate risk by coronary calcium score: a serial study using non-contrast cardiac CT

    Atherosclerosis

    (2011)
  • S. Eroglu et al.

    Epicardial adipose tissue thickness by echocardiography is a marker for the presence and severity of coronary artery disease

    Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis

    (2009)
  • B. Tamarappoo et al.

    Increased pericardial fat volume measured from noncontrast CT predicts myocardial ischemia by SPECT

    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging

    (2010)
  • M. Janik et al.

    Epicardial adipose tissue volume and coronary artery calcium to predict myocardial ischemia on positron emission tomography-computed tomography studies

    J Nucl Cardiol

    (2010)
  • J. Ding et al.

    The association of pericardial fat with incident coronary heart disease: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA)

    Am J Clin Nutr

    (2009)
  • V.Y. Cheng et al.

    Pericardial fat burden on ECG-gated noncontrast CT in asymptomatic patients who subsequently experience adverse cardiovascular events

    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging

    (2010)
  • C.X. Wong et al.

    Pericardial fat is associated with atrial fibrillation severity and ablation outcome

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2011)
  • S. Sarin et al.

    Clinical significance of epicardial fat measured using cardiac multislice computed tomography

    Am J Cardiol

    (2008)
  • P.M. Gorter et al.

    Quantification of epicardial and peri-coronary fat using cardiac computed tomography; reproducibility and relation with obesity and metabolic syndrome in patients suspected of coronary artery disease

    Atherosclerosis

    (2008)
  • Cited by (70)

    • Epicardial fat tissue, coronary arterial calcification and mortality in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease and hemodialysis

      2021, Nefrologia
      Citation Excerpt :

      The distinction between the different locations of fat deposits is important, since pericardial fat has specific metabolic characteristics and different blood drainage.13–17 The quantification of EAT is not standardized, the studies are heterogeneous in terms of radiological technique and the location of the fat, and there is no consensus on the reference ranges.13,18 In patients with advanced CKD or undergoing renal replacement therapy, the volume of EAT has been linked to coronary artery calcification (CaC), atherosclerosis, inflammation and malnutrition.12,19–22

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Conflict of interest: Stephan Achenbach received research support from Bayer Schering Pharma and Siemens.

    View full text