Expert Consensus Document2015 SCAI/ACC/HFSA/STS Clinical Expert Consensus Statement on the Use of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiovascular Care: Endorsed by the American Heart Assocation, the Cardiological Society of India, and Sociedad Latino Americana de Cardiologia Intervencion; Affirmation of Value by the Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology-Association Canadienne de Cardiologie d’intervention∗
Key Words
Cited by (0)
The document will also appear in the Journal of Cardiac Failure and Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions.
Conflict of interest: See Appendix A Author Relationships With Industry and Other Entities (Relevant)–SCAI/ACC/HFSA/STS Clinical Expert Consensus Statement on the Use of Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Cardiovascular Care, Appendix B Author Relationships With Industry and Other Entities (Comprehensive)–SCAI/ACC/HFSA/STS Clinical Expert Consensus Statement on the Use of Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Cardiovascular Care, Appendix C Peer Reviewer Relationships With Industry and Other Entities (Relevant)–SCAI/ACC/HFSA/STS Clinical Expert Consensus Statement on the Use of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiovascular Care.
The American College of Cardiology requests that this document be cited as follows: Rihal CS, Naidu SS, Givertz MM, Szeto WY, Burker JA, Kapur NK, Kern M, Garratt KN, Goldstein JA, Dimas V, Tu T. 2015 SCAI/ACC/HFSA/STS clinical expert consensus statement on the use of percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices in cardiovascular care (endorsed by the American Heart Association, the Cardiological Society of India, and Sociedad Latino Americana de Cardiología Intervencionista; affirmation of value by the Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology—Association Canadienne de Cardiologie d'intervention). J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;65:e7–26.
- ∗
The Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology (CAIC) is approached by other guideline developers and asked to review and consider guidelines for endorsement. Guidelines developed by external organizations will be considered for affirmation of value. The CAIC may not agree with every recommendation in such a document, but overall considers the document to be of educational value to its members.