Clinical Investigation
Valvular Heart Disease
Relationship between Longitudinal Strain and Symptomatic Status in Aortic Stenosis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2013.05.004Get rights and content

Background

Global longitudinal strain (GLS) and basal longitudinal strain (BLS) assessed using two-dimensional speckle-tracking imaging have been proposed as subtle markers of left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction with potential prognostic value in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between longitudinal strain and symptomatic status in patients with AS.

Methods

GLS and BLS were measured in 171 patients with pure, isolated, at least mild AS prospectively enrolled at two institutions. The population was divided into four groups: asymptomatic nonsevere AS (n = 55), asymptomatic severe AS with preserved LV ejection fraction (LVEF; ≥50%) (n = 37), symptomatic severe AS with preserved LVEF (n = 60), and severe AS with reduced LVEF (<50%) (n = 19).

Results

GLS was significantly different among the four groups (P < .0001), but the difference was due mainly to patients with reduced LVEFs. In addition, there was an important overlap among the groups, and in multivariate analysis, after adjustment for age, gender, AS severity, and LVEF, GLS was not an independent predictor of symptomatic status (P = .07). BLS was also significantly different among the four groups (P < .0001) but in contrast was independently associated with symptomatic status (P < .0001). However, as for GLS, there was an important overlap between groups and differences were close to intraobserver or interobserver variability (1.3 ± 1.1% and 2.0 ± 1.6%, respectively).

Conclusions

In this prospective multicenter cohort of patients with wide ranges of AS severity, symptoms, and LVEFs, BLS but not GLS was independently associated with symptomatic status. However, there was an important overlap among groups, and differences were close to measurements' reproducibility, raising caution regarding the use of longitudinal strain, at least as a single criterion, in the decision-making process for patients with severe asymptomatic AS.

Section snippets

Study Population

We prospectively enrolled patients with AS at two institutions (Bichat Hospital, Paris, France, and Henri-Mondor Hospital, Creteil, France) from February 2009 to June 2010. The inclusion criterion was pure, at least mild AS (defined by a mean pressure gradient [MPG] > 10 mm Hg). Exclusion criteria were more than mild coexisting aortic regurgitation (defined by a vena contracta width ≥ 3 mm or a regurgitant volume ≥ 30 mL)9 or other valvular heart disease, segmental LV wall motion abnormality

Population Characteristics

We prospectively enrolled 171 patients (mean age, 73 ± 12 years; 40% women) with at least mild AS from two centers (127 from Bichat Hospital and 44 from Henri-Mondor Hospital). Hypertension was present in 65% of patients, and 17% had known histories of CAD. The mean LVEF was 62 ± 9% (median, 65%; range, 25%–79%), and most patients had preserved LVEFs (≥50% in 89% of patients). The mean AVA was 0.99 ± 0.43 cm2 (median, 0.93 cm2; range, 0.30–2.00 cm2), the mean MPG was 44 ± 23 mm Hg (median, 42

Discussion

In the present study, in a two-center cohort of patients with wide ranges of symptoms, LVEFs, and AS severity, we showed that BLS but not GLS was independently associated with symptomatic status. However, there was an important overlap among groups, and absolute differences of either GLS or BLS between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with severe AS and preserved LVEFs were close to measurements' reproducibility. Thus, our results raise caution regarding the sole use of longitudinal

Conclusions

In this prospective two-center cohort of patients with wide ranges of AS severity, symptoms, and ejection fractions, we showed that BLS but not GLS was independently associated with symptomatic status. However, differences between groups were small, close to measurements' reproducibility, with an important overlap among subgroups, raising caution regarding the use of longitudinal strain, at least as a single criterion, in the decision-making process of patients with severe asymptomatic AS.

References (26)

  • J.G. Dumesnil et al.

    A mathematical model of the dynamic geometry of the intact left ventricle and its application to clinical data

    Circulation

    (1979)
  • V. Delgado et al.

    Strain analysis in patients with severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction undergoing surgical valve replacement

    Eur Heart J

    (2009)
  • D. Cramariuc et al.

    Myocardial deformation in aortic valve stenosis: relation to left ventricular geometry

    Heart

    (2010)
  • Cited by (52)

    • Strain Imaging: An Everyday Tool for the Perioperative Echocardiographer

      2020, Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
    • The Association Between Longitudinal Strain at Rest and Stress and Outcome in Asymptomatic Patients With Moderate and Severe Aortic Stenosis

      2019, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
      Citation Excerpt :

      In this study, the difference between GLS and BLS was significantly lower compared with the study by Lafitte et al.17 The reasons for the changes in the values in GLS and BLS between the studies may be related to differences in the studied population, including AS severity and the presence of coronary disease. This may also be related to image quality and to software version.35,36 There are no reports on the significance of peak exercise BLS in asymptomatic patients with AS.

    • Echocardiographic Imaging for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

      2018, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
    • Prognostic Value of Left Ventricular Deformation Parameters in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Pilot Study of the Usefulness of Strain Echocardiography

      2017, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
      Citation Excerpt :

      On the basis of our studies of healthy control subjects and different cardiomyopathies, mechanical dispersion > 65 to 70 msec seems to be an equitable cutoff value in patients with severe AS, in whom fibrosis, ischemia, and ventricular arrhythmias might promote adverse outcomes. The presence of abnormal LV mechanics in patients with AS and preserved LVEFs is well known.26-29 Previous studies have shown that these patients have reduced longitudinal myocardial function that improves after AVR.30

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The Aortic Stenosis in Elderly: Determinant of Progression (COFRASA) and Genetic of Aortic Valve Stenosis: Clinical and Therapeutic Implications (GENERAC) studies are supported grants from Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (PHRC National 2005 and PHRC Regional 2007) (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00338676 and NCT00647088).

    View full text