TY - JOUR T1 - Long-term outcomes after radiofrequency catheter ablation of the atrioventricular node: The experience of a Portuguese tertiary center JO - Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia (English edition) T2 - AU - Manuel,Ana Mosalina AU - Almeida,João AU - Fonseca,Paulo AU - Monteiro,Joel AU - Guerreiro,Cláudio AU - Barbosa,Ana Raquel AU - Teixeira,Pedro AU - Ribeiro,José AU - Santos,Elisabeth AU - Rosas,Filipa AU - Ribeiro,José AU - Dias,Adelaide AU - Caeiro,Daniel AU - Sousa,Olga AU - Teixeira,Madalena AU - Oliveira,Marco AU - Gonçalves,Helena AU - Primo,João AU - Braga,Pedro SN - 21742049 M3 - 10.1016/j.repce.2020.05.025 DO - 10.1016/j.repce.2020.05.025 UR - https://www.revportcardiol.org/en-long-term-outcomes-after-radiofrequency-catheter-articulo-S2174204921000428 AB - IntroductionIn patients with supraventricular arrhythmias and high ventricular rate, unresponsive to rate and rhythm control therapy or catheter ablation, atrioventricular (AV) node ablation may be performed. ObjectivesTo assess long-term outcomes after AV node ablation and to analyze predictors of adverse events. MethodsWe performed a detailed retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent AV node ablation between February 1997 and February 2019, in a single Portuguese tertiary center. ResultsA total of 123 patients, mean age 69±9 years and 52% male, underwent AV node ablation. Most of them presented atrial fibrillation at baseline (65%). During a median follow-up of 8.5 years (interquartile range 3.8-11.8), patients improved heart failure (HF)functional class (NYHA class III-IV 46% versus 13%, p=0.001), and there were reductions in hospitalizations due to HF (0.98±1.3 versus 0.28±0.8, p=0.001) and emergency department (ED) visits (1.1±1 versus 0.17±0.7, p=0.0001). There were no device-related complications. Despite permanent pacemaker stimulation, left ventricular ejection fraction did not worsen (47±13% vs. 47%±12, p=0.63). Twenty-eight patients died (23%). The number of ED visits due to HF before AV node ablation was an independent predictor of the composite adverse outcome (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.24-2.61, p=0.002). ConclusionsDespite pacemaker dependency, the clinical benefit of AV node ablation persisted at long-term follow-up. The number of ED visits due to HF before AV node ablation was an independent predictor of the composite adverse outcome. AV node ablation should probably be considered earlier in the treatment of patients with supraventricular arrhythmias and HF, especially in cases that are unsuitable for selective ablation of the specific arrhythmia. ER -